跳到主要內容

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”! (2025/July)

 

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”!

An International Press Conference by the DangWai (Non-Partisan) Opposition Alliance of Taiwan

 

Taiwan has set yet another “first in the world” precedent.

According to a story that first broke with a report on July 20 in the South China Morning Post and that was subsequently picked up by various international media, Taiwan’s recent pledge to fund an Israeli settlement health project in the West Bank has broken international norms proscribing engagement with Israel’s occupation. Israel’s settlements and overall presence in the West Bank have been deemed illegal by several international bodies, including the United Nations Security Council (No.2334, 2016), United Nations General Assembly (2024/Sep.) and the International Court of Justice (2024/July). The ICJ has specifically ruled that all states are not to “render aid or assistance” toward “maintaining Israel's presence in the occupied territories.” Despite this consensus in the international bodies, “Taiwan seems to be,” according to Gleider Hernández, professor of public international law at the University of Leuven in Belgium, “the first government to make a direct financial contribution to the settlements.”

Yes, we have not forgotten about No Other Land, awarded Best Documentary Feature Film by the 97th Annual Academy Awards. Screened recently in Taiwan, this documentary deeply informs our sense of outrage over the brutality visited by Israeli West Bank settlers upon dispossessed and brutalized Palestinians.

Nevertheless, Taiwan’s current DPP-run administration, backed by the party’s parliamentary caucus, has continued to conduct business as usual with Israel. The promise of donations to illegal settlements in the West Bank condoned by the Netanyahu government is nothing more than a naked transaction made in exchange for Israel’s political support of Taiwan. This kind of transactional support is, it must be said, of a shamelessly spurious nature. It is not based on the universal values of democracy and human rights, and its cost is to alienate and lose credibility from over 140 countries globally who recognize the Palestinian state, including the pending recognitions from France and Spain, and who condemn Israel’s illegal settlements.

The current DPP administration presides over a huge tax revenue surplus from 2024 reaching NT$500 billion (approximately US$16.8 billion), yet despite Taiwan’s current economic difficulties and the announcement of 20% tariffs on goods exported to the US, this administration refuses to execute the terms of a tax refund recently passed by the national legislature that would refund NT$10,000 (US$330) to citizens and non-citizen residents. Instead, this government is happy to channel much-needed funds to Israel, whose per capita GDP is 1.6 times that of Taiwan and whose international status as a rogue state in the Middle East, committing genocide in Gaza, is utterly notorious. No wonder activists in Taiwan have been quick to point out that the promised donation to illegal settlements in the West Bank is a source of deep shame, an embarrassment on an international scale that lends a new—and highly negative—connotation to the slogan, promoted by the DPP in recent years, “Taiwan Can Help.”

In addition to provoking an unfathomable loss of credibility on an international scale, Taiwan’s reckless actions also reawaken the baggage of deeper historical and structural precedents. For there was a time not so long ago when Taiwan was actively interested in learning from Israel, the American attack dog in the Middle East. In the 1960s and 70s, when the Israeli arms industry was a major supplier of small arms to Guatemala and Israel’s counterinsurgency experts advised security forces in Guatemala and other Central American nations in the genocidal operations conducted by brutal oligarchic dictatorships in the region, Taiwan’s political propagandists enthusiastically followed suit, sending their own delegations to help train Central American governmental death squads. Thus, Taiwan’s name was indissociably linked with that of Israel in assisting Central American dictatorial regimes, doing the bidding of US Empire to control its so-called “backyard.” In the eyes of the Global South, Taiwan lost credibility on an international scale a long time ago. In fact, the list of actions that have contributed to a growing loss of international credibility is long. The recent “Operation Grim Beeper” pager attack conducted by Israeli intelligence forces that resulted in indiscriminate mass civilian casualties relied on pagers suspiciously assembled by a certain manufacturing company in Taiwan.

The root cause of this notorious and illegal political tradition of Taiwan stems from Taiwan’s total dependence on the US after WWII. Boasting a strategic location in the First Island Chain as part of the US containment policy directed against China, Taiwan has willfully taken up a role as the unofficial provocateur for the US in East Asia by sporting an aggressive anticommunist posture. The current DDP government of Taiwan continues this ignominious tradition by advancing a policy of “Protecting Taiwan by Confronting China” (抗中保台) in order to gain American protection and acquire backing for the DPP’s claims to exclusively represent what it considers to be the national sovereignty of Taiwan against the so-called constant threats of China. In light of this sordid history, it is clear that Israel’s relation to Taiwan can be likened to that of a proverbial older brother. As the stronger and more infamous imperial attack dog in the Middle East, Israel has set a bad example for Taiwan, the “little brother” that emulates the older one by treating China as an alien enemy and confronting it in alignment with US strategic goals.

In order to definitively put an end to this notorious political legacy and to disassociate itself from Israel, Taiwan needs, variously, to stop constantly confronting China, to stop constantly being a vassal of the US, to bravely take a principled neutral position between China and the US, to interact in a friendly manner with both China and the US, and, finally, to befriend the Global South. This also means that we need to help the Palestinian people in both Gaza and the West Bank and sincerely donate whatever we can to help them. Although we may not be “first in the world” in this respect, it is never too late to offer a helping hand to the dispossessed.

To that end, we are compelled to express our solemn condemnation on four points of the Faustian diplomacy undertaken by President Lai. On Lai’s watch, Taiwan is trading with the devil, as it were, an inglorious deal symbolized by the unwholesome alignment between the settler colonial societies of Israel and the imperial United States—whether acting in the interest of preserving unipolar global dominance, or in the interest of a MAGA restoration:

1) Taiwan’s donation in this case openly violates international laws and would make Taiwan an accomplice to illegal occupation, colonization, and apartheid.

2) This is a shameful political transaction, trading Taiwan’s national integrity for spurious support.

3) This is yet another short-sighted policy of vassalization, sacrificing Taiwan’s diplomatic autonomy to a great power.

4) This is an open betrayal of Taiwan’s internal needs, ignoring the serious challenges to domestic livelihood.

Finally, we demand:

1) The DPP government should immediately stop all dealings related to illegal settlements in West Bank and apologize to Taiwan’s people for its serious diplomatic mistake.

2) The government of the Republic of China should not engage in any investment, technological cooperation, or official contacts with Israel’s illegal settlements in the West Bank.

(31/July/'25)

Note: The following was the supporting letter from Japan's AALA association.

We fully support your statementstrongly criticizing the Lai administration's policy on the urgent international issue. We share your position that the support for the Netanyahu administration is unacceptable, which continues its barbaric genocide, the starvation strategy in particular.

 

We empathy the reasons why the people of Taiwan have raised their voices in this manner. As the statement points out, the Lai administration in Taiwan appears to be complicit in the strategy of the U.S globalists and neoconservative forces, acting as a proxy to provoke the Mainland China, same as Zelensky in Ukraine against Russia and the Netanyahu in Israel against Middle Eastern countries. Japan is also being utilized in this strategy, and we strongly oppose it.

 

Stopping Israel's genocide and starvation strategy is an urgent task, but the international community's response remains sluggish. While countries like the UK and France have expressed their intention to recognize the Palestinian statehood, they have not taken concrete measures to stop Israel's current actions and continue to provide military support.

 

The Japanese government continues to provide technical cooperation to Israel, holds a significant amount of Israeli government bonds through the national pension fund, and owns a large stake in shares of American military companies that support Isreali crime.

 

Japan AALA demands that these forms of cooperation be immediately halted and that recognition of the Palestinian state be granted.

 

Let us come together to stop the genocide and Middle East invasion carried out by Israel and the United States and work towards peace in East Asia.

Best wishes for all friends

留言

新基進筆記的熱門文章…

Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography

  Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography 1, Brief introduction Daiwie Fu, ( 傅大為 birth in 1953, Sep.) is a   Taiwanese   academic, the founding editor in chief of an international STS academic journal   East Asian Science, Technology and Society , and a self-appointed radical intellectual. Former Distinguished Professor of the graduate institute of STS, now Emeritus Professor in National Yang-Ming Chao-Tong University. His research areas are: science and technology studies, gender and medicine in modern Taiwan, gender and science, East Asian STS, history and philosophy of science, and also history of Chinese science (mainly on   biji , Mengxi Bitan and the cultural history of science in the   Song Dynasty ), and recently he extends his research on actions of contemporary radical intellectuals. He published papers widely in Chinese, English, Italian, Korean, and Japanese. He published three academic books, a few books of social criticisms, an...

杭士基談俄國入侵烏克蘭

  杭士基談俄國入侵烏克蘭: 它的起源、如何應對、與人類歷史的關鍵 杭士基在 2022 三月一日發表了這個談話。雖然離今天已經過了一個星期了,但這個談話的觀察與回顧,超越了每日的侵略與戰爭進展,很值得我們細讀與反思,甚至可以放進台灣今天的脈絡裡。文中有七個地方,杭士基訪談原文在那裡都有進一步的網址,算是他自己的資料註釋。有興趣的讀者可以進入網頁原文去找那些超連結,另外我也加了八個譯注, 放在譯文結尾 。 傅大為 Mar. 8th 此文在 Truthout 的原網址為: https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/ ------------------------------     諾姆.杭士基 (Noam Chomsky) :美國對俄國的軍事行動升級,不會有勝利者 Truthout, 1/March/2022, C.J.Polychroniou 訪談 傅大為譯 2022/3/8 前言: 俄國入侵烏克蘭,讓世人大吃一驚。杭士基在一個 Truthout 的獨家訪談中認為,它是個無端、沒有正當理由的攻擊,並將成為 21 世紀歷史上最主要的戰火罪行之一。俄國總統普丁的政治考慮,不能用來做為發動入侵一個主權國家的理由。但是,面對這個可怕的入侵,美國一定得採用緊急的外交作法,而非軍事行動的升級,因為後者可能會成為「執行我們整個物種的死刑,沒有任何勝利的一方」。 諾姆.杭士基 (Noam Chomsky) 是國際上承認當今在世最重要的知識分子之一。他的知識地位曾被拿來與伽利略、牛頓與笛卡爾做比較,因為他的工作在一整串不同的學術與科學研究上都有極大的影響,包括了語言學、邏輯與數學、計算機科學、心理學、媒體研究、哲學、政治與國際關係等。他是約 150 本書的作者。。。 MIT 的榮譽學院教授、目前是 Arizona 大學的桂冠教授。   Polychroniou: 諾姆,俄國入侵烏克蘭,驚訝了很多人,震驚了世界。但早有很多的跡象顯示,普丁對 NATO (北大西洋公約組織)的向東擴張、還有華盛頓拒絕認真看待普丁的維安「紅線」(包括烏克蘭...

戰爭正迫使烏克蘭左翼分子就暴力問題做出艱難的決定 (2022/Mar.)

  戰爭正迫使烏克蘭左翼分子就暴力問題做出艱難的決定 ( War Is Forcing Ukrainian Leftists to Make Difficult Decisions About Violence ) Mike Ludwig   Truthout 發表 2022 年 3 月 5 日      (此中文稿來自 Google Chinese translation, 在經過傅大為的修正與校定 12/Mar./2022 )   自從 2 月 24 日俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭以來,警笛聲和爆炸聲每天都在震撼 Yurii Sheliazhenko 位於基輔的五層樓房子。 Sheliazhenko 是烏克蘭和平運動的執行董事,在一個處於戰爭狀態的國家中為和平發出孤立而堅定的聲音。他因拒絕攜帶武器、不肯與鄰居一起製作燃燒彈以抵禦前進的俄羅斯軍隊而經歷了(來自國民的) “ 很多仇視 ” 。當然, 俄羅斯軍隊正面臨著來自烏克蘭平民轉為戰士的頑強抵抗。 “ 首先,說實話,和平沒有暴力途徑, ” 謝利亞任科在通過電子郵件詢問美國人可以做些什麼來支持烏克蘭的社會運動者時說。 在基輔附近的其他地方, “ 伊利亞 ” ( Ilya ) 和他的戰友已經拿起武器對抗俄羅斯軍隊,並正在為戰鬥進行訓練。因暴力升級而不得不隱瞞身份的伊利亞是一名無政府主義者,他逃離鄰國的政治鎮壓,決定抵抗俄羅斯的入侵。與來自烏克蘭和世界各地的無政府主義者、民主社會主義者、反法西斯主義者和其他左翼分子一起,伊利亞加入了 “ 領土防禦 ” 的 單位之一,該單位在烏克蘭軍隊的領導下像自願民兵一樣運作,具有一定程度的自治權。在互助組織和承擔民事職責的志願者的橫向聯盟的支持下,這些反威權主義者在領土防禦結構內擁有自己的 “ 國際分遣隊 ” ,並正在 籌集 物資─ 根據 一個名為抵抗委員會 (Resistance Committee) 的組織如是說。   表單的底部 “ 當敵人攻擊你時,很難採取反戰和平主義立場,這是因為你需要保護自己, ” 伊利亞在接受 Truthout 採訪時說。 Sheliazhenko 和 Ilya 的不同道路說明了烏克蘭的基進分子和進步的社會運動所面臨的艱...