跳到主要內容

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”! (2025/July)

 

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”!

An International Press Conference by the DangWai (Non-Partisan) Opposition Alliance of Taiwan

 

Taiwan has set yet another “first in the world” precedent.

According to a story that first broke with a report on July 20 in the South China Morning Post and that was subsequently picked up by various international media, Taiwan’s recent pledge to fund an Israeli settlement health project in the West Bank has broken international norms proscribing engagement with Israel’s occupation. Israel’s settlements and overall presence in the West Bank have been deemed illegal by several international bodies, including the United Nations Security Council (No.2334, 2016), United Nations General Assembly (2024/Sep.) and the International Court of Justice (2024/July). The ICJ has specifically ruled that all states are not to “render aid or assistance” toward “maintaining Israel's presence in the occupied territories.” Despite this consensus in the international bodies, “Taiwan seems to be,” according to Gleider Hernández, professor of public international law at the University of Leuven in Belgium, “the first government to make a direct financial contribution to the settlements.”

Yes, we have not forgotten about No Other Land, awarded Best Documentary Feature Film by the 97th Annual Academy Awards. Screened recently in Taiwan, this documentary deeply informs our sense of outrage over the brutality visited by Israeli West Bank settlers upon dispossessed and brutalized Palestinians.

Nevertheless, Taiwan’s current DPP-run administration, backed by the party’s parliamentary caucus, has continued to conduct business as usual with Israel. The promise of donations to illegal settlements in the West Bank condoned by the Netanyahu government is nothing more than a naked transaction made in exchange for Israel’s political support of Taiwan. This kind of transactional support is, it must be said, of a shamelessly spurious nature. It is not based on the universal values of democracy and human rights, and its cost is to alienate and lose credibility from over 140 countries globally who recognize the Palestinian state, including the pending recognitions from France and Spain, and who condemn Israel’s illegal settlements.

The current DPP administration presides over a huge tax revenue surplus from 2024 reaching NT$500 billion (approximately US$16.8 billion), yet despite Taiwan’s current economic difficulties and the announcement of 20% tariffs on goods exported to the US, this administration refuses to execute the terms of a tax refund recently passed by the national legislature that would refund NT$10,000 (US$330) to citizens and non-citizen residents. Instead, this government is happy to channel much-needed funds to Israel, whose per capita GDP is 1.6 times that of Taiwan and whose international status as a rogue state in the Middle East, committing genocide in Gaza, is utterly notorious. No wonder activists in Taiwan have been quick to point out that the promised donation to illegal settlements in the West Bank is a source of deep shame, an embarrassment on an international scale that lends a new—and highly negative—connotation to the slogan, promoted by the DPP in recent years, “Taiwan Can Help.”

In addition to provoking an unfathomable loss of credibility on an international scale, Taiwan’s reckless actions also reawaken the baggage of deeper historical and structural precedents. For there was a time not so long ago when Taiwan was actively interested in learning from Israel, the American attack dog in the Middle East. In the 1960s and 70s, when the Israeli arms industry was a major supplier of small arms to Guatemala and Israel’s counterinsurgency experts advised security forces in Guatemala and other Central American nations in the genocidal operations conducted by brutal oligarchic dictatorships in the region, Taiwan’s political propagandists enthusiastically followed suit, sending their own delegations to help train Central American governmental death squads. Thus, Taiwan’s name was indissociably linked with that of Israel in assisting Central American dictatorial regimes, doing the bidding of US Empire to control its so-called “backyard.” In the eyes of the Global South, Taiwan lost credibility on an international scale a long time ago. In fact, the list of actions that have contributed to a growing loss of international credibility is long. The recent “Operation Grim Beeper” pager attack conducted by Israeli intelligence forces that resulted in indiscriminate mass civilian casualties relied on pagers suspiciously assembled by a certain manufacturing company in Taiwan.

The root cause of this notorious and illegal political tradition of Taiwan stems from Taiwan’s total dependence on the US after WWII. Boasting a strategic location in the First Island Chain as part of the US containment policy directed against China, Taiwan has willfully taken up a role as the unofficial provocateur for the US in East Asia by sporting an aggressive anticommunist posture. The current DDP government of Taiwan continues this ignominious tradition by advancing a policy of “Protecting Taiwan by Confronting China” (抗中保台) in order to gain American protection and acquire backing for the DPP’s claims to exclusively represent what it considers to be the national sovereignty of Taiwan against the so-called constant threats of China. In light of this sordid history, it is clear that Israel’s relation to Taiwan can be likened to that of a proverbial older brother. As the stronger and more infamous imperial attack dog in the Middle East, Israel has set a bad example for Taiwan, the “little brother” that emulates the older one by treating China as an alien enemy and confronting it in alignment with US strategic goals.

In order to definitively put an end to this notorious political legacy and to disassociate itself from Israel, Taiwan needs, variously, to stop constantly confronting China, to stop constantly being a vassal of the US, to bravely take a principled neutral position between China and the US, to interact in a friendly manner with both China and the US, and, finally, to befriend the Global South. This also means that we need to help the Palestinian people in both Gaza and the West Bank and sincerely donate whatever we can to help them. Although we may not be “first in the world” in this respect, it is never too late to offer a helping hand to the dispossessed.

To that end, we are compelled to express our solemn condemnation on four points of the Faustian diplomacy undertaken by President Lai. On Lai’s watch, Taiwan is trading with the devil, as it were, an inglorious deal symbolized by the unwholesome alignment between the settler colonial societies of Israel and the imperial United States—whether acting in the interest of preserving unipolar global dominance, or in the interest of a MAGA restoration:

1) Taiwan’s donation in this case openly violates international laws and would make Taiwan an accomplice to illegal occupation, colonization, and apartheid.

2) This is a shameful political transaction, trading Taiwan’s national integrity for spurious support.

3) This is yet another short-sighted policy of vassalization, sacrificing Taiwan’s diplomatic autonomy to a great power.

4) This is an open betrayal of Taiwan’s internal needs, ignoring the serious challenges to domestic livelihood.

Finally, we demand:

1) The DPP government should immediately stop all dealings related to illegal settlements in West Bank and apologize to Taiwan’s people for its serious diplomatic mistake.

2) The government of the Republic of China should not engage in any investment, technological cooperation, or official contacts with Israel’s illegal settlements in the West Bank.

(31/July/'25)

Note: The following was the supporting letter from Japan's AALA association.

We fully support your statementstrongly criticizing the Lai administration's policy on the urgent international issue. We share your position that the support for the Netanyahu administration is unacceptable, which continues its barbaric genocide, the starvation strategy in particular.

 

We empathy the reasons why the people of Taiwan have raised their voices in this manner. As the statement points out, the Lai administration in Taiwan appears to be complicit in the strategy of the U.S globalists and neoconservative forces, acting as a proxy to provoke the Mainland China, same as Zelensky in Ukraine against Russia and the Netanyahu in Israel against Middle Eastern countries. Japan is also being utilized in this strategy, and we strongly oppose it.

 

Stopping Israel's genocide and starvation strategy is an urgent task, but the international community's response remains sluggish. While countries like the UK and France have expressed their intention to recognize the Palestinian statehood, they have not taken concrete measures to stop Israel's current actions and continue to provide military support.

 

The Japanese government continues to provide technical cooperation to Israel, holds a significant amount of Israeli government bonds through the national pension fund, and owns a large stake in shares of American military companies that support Isreali crime.

 

Japan AALA demands that these forms of cooperation be immediately halted and that recognition of the Palestinian state be granted.

 

Let us come together to stop the genocide and Middle East invasion carried out by Israel and the United States and work towards peace in East Asia.

Best wishes for all friends

留言

新基進筆記的熱門文章…

Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography

  Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography 1, Brief introduction Daiwie Fu, ( 傅大為 birth in 1953, Sep.) is a   Taiwanese   academic, the founding editor in chief of an international STS academic journal   East Asian Science, Technology and Society , and a self-appointed radical intellectual. Former Distinguished Professor of the graduate institute of STS, now Emeritus Professor in National Yang-Ming Chao-Tong University. His research areas are: science and technology studies, gender and medicine in modern Taiwan, gender and science, East Asian STS, history and philosophy of science, and also history of Chinese science (mainly on   biji , Mengxi Bitan and the cultural history of science in the   Song Dynasty ), and recently he extends his research on actions of contemporary radical intellectuals. He published papers widely in Chinese, English, Italian, Korean, and Japanese. He published three academic books, a few books of social criticisms, an...

從「洪水來臨前」的一點STS觀察

從「洪水來臨前」(Before the Flood)的一點STS觀察  奧斯卡最佳男主角李奧那多,這兩年來是聯合國的和平大使,走遍世界與全球暖化相關的地方,拍了相當多的訪問與觀察,然後與過去全球暖化的許多論點一起剪接起來,成為國家地理頻道已經在Youtube 免費播放第七天(還有三天)的 "Before the Flood" 紀錄片。片子不短,有95分鐘,但七天內我看到英文version的觀看次數已經突破千萬次,繁體中文版也達到一百八十萬次,就先不說其他語言的情況了。 李奧那多不是這幾年才趕流行成為關切全球暖化的尖兵,他年輕的時候,就已經很關心這個議題,也認真地訪問了一些政要,包括後來的歐巴馬。在某些片段裡,他坐在車子的後座,遙望逐漸往後逝去的遠景,的確有點像2006年前高爾在「不願面對的真相」中也是遠望的神情。但是當年高爾只是以美國前副總統的身份大力提倡,今天的李奧那多在世界上大概擁有更多的觀眾,且是聯合國的和平大使,在「洪水來臨前」的片尾,他在世界性的2015年巴黎氣候控制公約的大會中作結尾演說,所以他在美國之外,恐怕有更大的影響力。(在21世紀前十年,美國的民調仍常顯示相當大百分比的人不相信全球暖化) 那麼「洪水來臨前」在論證上,有多大的說服力呢?有多少新的論點呢?比起「不願面對」,我粗略的感覺是說服力差不多,也並沒有因為十年之後,而累積了更多的證據,而最明顯的增加,恐怕就是李奧那多的個人魅力了。以下,我想從STS的角度,來重新評估一下一些常見的論點(洪水來臨前與不願面對二片大致都有的)。例如強調這個科學爭議(究竟全球暖化的原因是甚麼?)幾乎已經結束,相信CO2說法的科學家已經達到97%。而剩下的3%的科學家,常常收受大石油公司、還有畜牧業的經費與計畫。他們都很積極地去顯示反對的科學家他們資源與利益的社會關係,繼而質疑反對的科學家們知識的可靠性。但是,如果從STS的公平與對稱原則來看,就應該也對97%贊成的科學家他們資源與利益的社會關係作分析,以前 Yearley 好像提過,贊成的科學家們也有幾個重要的組成成分。若能夠對稱性的作分析,我們或許對贊成的科學家們知識的可靠性,也有另一種評估。 當然,一個科技爭議,從對立到反對者只剩3%,大概這個爭議應該已算是終結了。美國...

像對待人類一樣對待所有難民,歐洲必需面對它的種族主義 (2022/Mar.)

  基進學者法蒂瑪對歐洲種族主義的歷史與政治,做了深入的說明。她強烈地討論到目前俄烏戰爭的烏克蘭難民的複雜狀況,包括隱藏的媒體種族主義、嚴重的制度雙重標準、還有歐洲白人主義的現況、歐洲是否可以對人類共同的歷史負責的未來等議題。最後,如果俄烏戰爭的難民問題值得深刻思考,那麼台灣未來是否可能也會遭遇難民問題,也是個可以預先思考的問題。傅大為 2022/3/22 像對待人類一樣對待所有難民,歐洲必需面對它的種族主義   2022 年 1 月 27 日,在英國倫敦議會大樓外,人們參加了 “ 歡迎難民 ” 抗議活動,要求撤銷將非法進入該國尋求庇護的法案定為刑事犯罪。 RASID NECATI ASLIM / ANADOLU AGENCY VIA GETTY IMAGES   Fatima El-Tayeb   ( 法蒂瑪 · 埃爾 - 塔耶布 ) 作者   Truthout. 發表 2022 年 3 月 20 日   (傅大為注:此原文來自 Truthout 的發文 ,中譯文的粗胚來自 google translation, 經過傅大為的校定、改正與八個註釋或尾注。文中保留了原文不少進一步的超連結。 2022, Mar. 22 )     對俄羅斯總統普京入侵烏克蘭的反應,強調了這一事件的特殊性、破壞性及其潛在的巨大全球後果。第二次世界大戰是一個常見的參考點。從那時起,人們的理解似乎是,歐洲從未見過這樣的事情。尤其是在西方媒體中,烏克蘭總統澤連斯基經常被比作溫斯頓 · 丘吉爾,作為民主大國抵抗無情的極權機器衝擊的代言人。 本文不關注這個與二戰比較的準確性,而是關注它們的情感脈絡 (affective contexts) 。在這裡,另一個二戰參考似乎很有用:艾梅 · 塞澤爾 ( Aimé Césaire ) [i] [i] 1950 年的格言,即歐洲「非常人文主義、非常基督教的資產階級」無法原諒希特勒的「不是 犯罪 本身,對人的犯罪,不是對人 的羞辱本身 ,而是,這是對白人的罪行,是對白人的羞辱,以及他向歐洲進行殖民主義宰制的事實,在此之前,這些宰制一直專門是保留給為阿爾及利亞的阿拉伯人、印度的「苦力」,以及非洲的 ‘n****...