跳到主要內容

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”! (2025/July)

 

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”!

An International Press Conference by the DangWai (Non-Partisan) Opposition Alliance of Taiwan

 

Taiwan has set yet another “first in the world” precedent.

According to a story that first broke with a report on July 20 in the South China Morning Post and that was subsequently picked up by various international media, Taiwan’s recent pledge to fund an Israeli settlement health project in the West Bank has broken international norms proscribing engagement with Israel’s occupation. Israel’s settlements and overall presence in the West Bank have been deemed illegal by several international bodies, including the United Nations Security Council (No.2334, 2016), United Nations General Assembly (2024/Sep.) and the International Court of Justice (2024/July). The ICJ has specifically ruled that all states are not to “render aid or assistance” toward “maintaining Israel's presence in the occupied territories.” Despite this consensus in the international bodies, “Taiwan seems to be,” according to Gleider Hernández, professor of public international law at the University of Leuven in Belgium, “the first government to make a direct financial contribution to the settlements.”

Yes, we have not forgotten about No Other Land, awarded Best Documentary Feature Film by the 97th Annual Academy Awards. Screened recently in Taiwan, this documentary deeply informs our sense of outrage over the brutality visited by Israeli West Bank settlers upon dispossessed and brutalized Palestinians.

Nevertheless, Taiwan’s current DPP-run administration, backed by the party’s parliamentary caucus, has continued to conduct business as usual with Israel. The promise of donations to illegal settlements in the West Bank condoned by the Netanyahu government is nothing more than a naked transaction made in exchange for Israel’s political support of Taiwan. This kind of transactional support is, it must be said, of a shamelessly spurious nature. It is not based on the universal values of democracy and human rights, and its cost is to alienate and lose credibility from over 140 countries globally who recognize the Palestinian state, including the pending recognitions from France and Spain, and who condemn Israel’s illegal settlements.

The current DPP administration presides over a huge tax revenue surplus from 2024 reaching NT$500 billion (approximately US$16.8 billion), yet despite Taiwan’s current economic difficulties and the announcement of 20% tariffs on goods exported to the US, this administration refuses to execute the terms of a tax refund recently passed by the national legislature that would refund NT$10,000 (US$330) to citizens and non-citizen residents. Instead, this government is happy to channel much-needed funds to Israel, whose per capita GDP is 1.6 times that of Taiwan and whose international status as a rogue state in the Middle East, committing genocide in Gaza, is utterly notorious. No wonder activists in Taiwan have been quick to point out that the promised donation to illegal settlements in the West Bank is a source of deep shame, an embarrassment on an international scale that lends a new—and highly negative—connotation to the slogan, promoted by the DPP in recent years, “Taiwan Can Help.”

In addition to provoking an unfathomable loss of credibility on an international scale, Taiwan’s reckless actions also reawaken the baggage of deeper historical and structural precedents. For there was a time not so long ago when Taiwan was actively interested in learning from Israel, the American attack dog in the Middle East. In the 1960s and 70s, when the Israeli arms industry was a major supplier of small arms to Guatemala and Israel’s counterinsurgency experts advised security forces in Guatemala and other Central American nations in the genocidal operations conducted by brutal oligarchic dictatorships in the region, Taiwan’s political propagandists enthusiastically followed suit, sending their own delegations to help train Central American governmental death squads. Thus, Taiwan’s name was indissociably linked with that of Israel in assisting Central American dictatorial regimes, doing the bidding of US Empire to control its so-called “backyard.” In the eyes of the Global South, Taiwan lost credibility on an international scale a long time ago. In fact, the list of actions that have contributed to a growing loss of international credibility is long. The recent “Operation Grim Beeper” pager attack conducted by Israeli intelligence forces that resulted in indiscriminate mass civilian casualties relied on pagers suspiciously assembled by a certain manufacturing company in Taiwan.

The root cause of this notorious and illegal political tradition of Taiwan stems from Taiwan’s total dependence on the US after WWII. Boasting a strategic location in the First Island Chain as part of the US containment policy directed against China, Taiwan has willfully taken up a role as the unofficial provocateur for the US in East Asia by sporting an aggressive anticommunist posture. The current DDP government of Taiwan continues this ignominious tradition by advancing a policy of “Protecting Taiwan by Confronting China” (抗中保台) in order to gain American protection and acquire backing for the DPP’s claims to exclusively represent what it considers to be the national sovereignty of Taiwan against the so-called constant threats of China. In light of this sordid history, it is clear that Israel’s relation to Taiwan can be likened to that of a proverbial older brother. As the stronger and more infamous imperial attack dog in the Middle East, Israel has set a bad example for Taiwan, the “little brother” that emulates the older one by treating China as an alien enemy and confronting it in alignment with US strategic goals.

In order to definitively put an end to this notorious political legacy and to disassociate itself from Israel, Taiwan needs, variously, to stop constantly confronting China, to stop constantly being a vassal of the US, to bravely take a principled neutral position between China and the US, to interact in a friendly manner with both China and the US, and, finally, to befriend the Global South. This also means that we need to help the Palestinian people in both Gaza and the West Bank and sincerely donate whatever we can to help them. Although we may not be “first in the world” in this respect, it is never too late to offer a helping hand to the dispossessed.

To that end, we are compelled to express our solemn condemnation on four points of the Faustian diplomacy undertaken by President Lai. On Lai’s watch, Taiwan is trading with the devil, as it were, an inglorious deal symbolized by the unwholesome alignment between the settler colonial societies of Israel and the imperial United States—whether acting in the interest of preserving unipolar global dominance, or in the interest of a MAGA restoration:

1) Taiwan’s donation in this case openly violates international laws and would make Taiwan an accomplice to illegal occupation, colonization, and apartheid.

2) This is a shameful political transaction, trading Taiwan’s national integrity for spurious support.

3) This is yet another short-sighted policy of vassalization, sacrificing Taiwan’s diplomatic autonomy to a great power.

4) This is an open betrayal of Taiwan’s internal needs, ignoring the serious challenges to domestic livelihood.

Finally, we demand:

1) The DPP government should immediately stop all dealings related to illegal settlements in West Bank and apologize to Taiwan’s people for its serious diplomatic mistake.

2) The government of the Republic of China should not engage in any investment, technological cooperation, or official contacts with Israel’s illegal settlements in the West Bank.

(31/July/'25)

Note: The following was the supporting letter from Japan's AALA association.

We fully support your statementstrongly criticizing the Lai administration's policy on the urgent international issue. We share your position that the support for the Netanyahu administration is unacceptable, which continues its barbaric genocide, the starvation strategy in particular.

 

We empathy the reasons why the people of Taiwan have raised their voices in this manner. As the statement points out, the Lai administration in Taiwan appears to be complicit in the strategy of the U.S globalists and neoconservative forces, acting as a proxy to provoke the Mainland China, same as Zelensky in Ukraine against Russia and the Netanyahu in Israel against Middle Eastern countries. Japan is also being utilized in this strategy, and we strongly oppose it.

 

Stopping Israel's genocide and starvation strategy is an urgent task, but the international community's response remains sluggish. While countries like the UK and France have expressed their intention to recognize the Palestinian statehood, they have not taken concrete measures to stop Israel's current actions and continue to provide military support.

 

The Japanese government continues to provide technical cooperation to Israel, holds a significant amount of Israeli government bonds through the national pension fund, and owns a large stake in shares of American military companies that support Isreali crime.

 

Japan AALA demands that these forms of cooperation be immediately halted and that recognition of the Palestinian state be granted.

 

Let us come together to stop the genocide and Middle East invasion carried out by Israel and the United States and work towards peace in East Asia.

Best wishes for all friends

留言

新基進筆記的熱門文章…

對海軍磐石艦疫情管控問題之討論

  對海軍磐石艦疫情管控問題之討論 海軍磐石油彈補給艦與檢疫相關的基本配備 (wiki 等資料 ) :官兵基本載量 165 人,內附野戰醫院, 3 病房、 15 病床,並有負壓隔離病房、 X 光機。甲板及機庫可各停放 33 噸大型直昇機,可垂直整補。磐石艦滿載吃水量 2 萬噸,是臺灣海軍目前噸位最大的軍艦。   本文企圖討論的基本問題:這次磐石艦 Covid-19 染疫,四月 15 日磐石艦 377 人下船回家,結果 18 日發生三個確診病例,當天指揮中心急召回敦睦艦隊共 744 人回營集中檢疫,全台幾個醫學中心在緊急檢驗之下,隔天發現磐石艦確診增加 21 人。為什麼在磐石艦下船放假前,磐石艦的醫官、敦睦艦隊的支隊醫療小組(磐石艦有三位醫官、另兩艦各一位醫官)、艦指部的聯檢小組等,不覺得有何異樣或風險,把官兵全放下船放假?在三月 15 號離開帛琉之後的一個月中,磐石艦不能先行發現病毒感染,並進行隔離與其他措施? 其實,這次敦睦艦隊在世界疫情大流行中出訪,對於防疫措施不可謂沒有用心準備。茲列數項(按國防部事後檢討的書面報告):口罩一人一天一片共備 45 天三萬四千個(按此次行程共 37 天)、 600 套隔離衣、船艙換氣及消毒每天兩次,並分批分時用餐。每日量體溫三次,另出發前每人施打流感疫苗。艦隊 3 月 5 日出港前,官兵就已經登艦報到,艦上自主管理 14 天,雖然 228 連假放假下船,但官兵長期在船艦上 (37+11 天 ) 的確辛苦。不過,這次敦睦艦隊磐石號載官兵 377 人,顯然遠超過原來的設計 ( 若 wiki 正確 ) ,也大幅增加防疫的困難度與仔細度,自然是個問題。(目前筆者不知道支隊醫療小組醫官們的經驗、專科與資歷如何,據說磐石艦醫官是中尉,而三位醫官中兩位出自陸軍)   即使磐石艦的設備先進完備,但在海上與國內的通訊(包括醫療相關資訊)並不流暢,也有保密的問題。根據國防部報告,三月 18 日及 27 日,敦睦艦隊海上得知原本欲訪問的國家疫情狀況,故臨時取消兩地的訪問。而臺灣 CDC 在四月 3 日發佈嗅覺異常為染疫的新徵狀,但艦指部於四月 9 日才電郵通知艦隊(基本已經進港),且艦隊醫師並未回溯官兵是否有此徵狀,而上船的聯檢小組也未將之列...

戰爭正迫使烏克蘭左翼分子就暴力問題做出艱難的決定 (2022/Mar.)

  戰爭正迫使烏克蘭左翼分子就暴力問題做出艱難的決定 ( War Is Forcing Ukrainian Leftists to Make Difficult Decisions About Violence ) Mike Ludwig   Truthout 發表 2022 年 3 月 5 日      (此中文稿來自 Google Chinese translation, 在經過傅大為的修正與校定 12/Mar./2022 )   自從 2 月 24 日俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭以來,警笛聲和爆炸聲每天都在震撼 Yurii Sheliazhenko 位於基輔的五層樓房子。 Sheliazhenko 是烏克蘭和平運動的執行董事,在一個處於戰爭狀態的國家中為和平發出孤立而堅定的聲音。他因拒絕攜帶武器、不肯與鄰居一起製作燃燒彈以抵禦前進的俄羅斯軍隊而經歷了(來自國民的) “ 很多仇視 ” 。當然, 俄羅斯軍隊正面臨著來自烏克蘭平民轉為戰士的頑強抵抗。 “ 首先,說實話,和平沒有暴力途徑, ” 謝利亞任科在通過電子郵件詢問美國人可以做些什麼來支持烏克蘭的社會運動者時說。 在基輔附近的其他地方, “ 伊利亞 ” ( Ilya ) 和他的戰友已經拿起武器對抗俄羅斯軍隊,並正在為戰鬥進行訓練。因暴力升級而不得不隱瞞身份的伊利亞是一名無政府主義者,他逃離鄰國的政治鎮壓,決定抵抗俄羅斯的入侵。與來自烏克蘭和世界各地的無政府主義者、民主社會主義者、反法西斯主義者和其他左翼分子一起,伊利亞加入了 “ 領土防禦 ” 的 單位之一,該單位在烏克蘭軍隊的領導下像自願民兵一樣運作,具有一定程度的自治權。在互助組織和承擔民事職責的志願者的橫向聯盟的支持下,這些反威權主義者在領土防禦結構內擁有自己的 “ 國際分遣隊 ” ,並正在 籌集 物資─ 根據 一個名為抵抗委員會 (Resistance Committee) 的組織如是說。   表單的底部 “ 當敵人攻擊你時,很難採取反戰和平主義立場,這是因為你需要保護自己, ” 伊利亞在接受 Truthout 採訪時說。 Sheliazhenko 和 Ilya 的不同道路說明了烏克蘭的基進分子和進步的社會運動所面臨的艱...

從「洪水來臨前」的一點STS觀察

從「洪水來臨前」(Before the Flood)的一點STS觀察  奧斯卡最佳男主角李奧那多,這兩年來是聯合國的和平大使,走遍世界與全球暖化相關的地方,拍了相當多的訪問與觀察,然後與過去全球暖化的許多論點一起剪接起來,成為國家地理頻道已經在Youtube 免費播放第七天(還有三天)的 "Before the Flood" 紀錄片。片子不短,有95分鐘,但七天內我看到英文version的觀看次數已經突破千萬次,繁體中文版也達到一百八十萬次,就先不說其他語言的情況了。 李奧那多不是這幾年才趕流行成為關切全球暖化的尖兵,他年輕的時候,就已經很關心這個議題,也認真地訪問了一些政要,包括後來的歐巴馬。在某些片段裡,他坐在車子的後座,遙望逐漸往後逝去的遠景,的確有點像2006年前高爾在「不願面對的真相」中也是遠望的神情。但是當年高爾只是以美國前副總統的身份大力提倡,今天的李奧那多在世界上大概擁有更多的觀眾,且是聯合國的和平大使,在「洪水來臨前」的片尾,他在世界性的2015年巴黎氣候控制公約的大會中作結尾演說,所以他在美國之外,恐怕有更大的影響力。(在21世紀前十年,美國的民調仍常顯示相當大百分比的人不相信全球暖化) 那麼「洪水來臨前」在論證上,有多大的說服力呢?有多少新的論點呢?比起「不願面對」,我粗略的感覺是說服力差不多,也並沒有因為十年之後,而累積了更多的證據,而最明顯的增加,恐怕就是李奧那多的個人魅力了。以下,我想從STS的角度,來重新評估一下一些常見的論點(洪水來臨前與不願面對二片大致都有的)。例如強調這個科學爭議(究竟全球暖化的原因是甚麼?)幾乎已經結束,相信CO2說法的科學家已經達到97%。而剩下的3%的科學家,常常收受大石油公司、還有畜牧業的經費與計畫。他們都很積極地去顯示反對的科學家他們資源與利益的社會關係,繼而質疑反對的科學家們知識的可靠性。但是,如果從STS的公平與對稱原則來看,就應該也對97%贊成的科學家他們資源與利益的社會關係作分析,以前 Yearley 好像提過,贊成的科學家們也有幾個重要的組成成分。若能夠對稱性的作分析,我們或許對贊成的科學家們知識的可靠性,也有另一種評估。 當然,一個科技爭議,從對立到反對者只剩3%,大概這個爭議應該已算是終結了。美國...