跳到主要內容

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”! (2025/July)

 

Reject Lai Ching-Te’s “Faustian Diplomacy”!

An International Press Conference by the DangWai (Non-Partisan) Opposition Alliance of Taiwan

 

Taiwan has set yet another “first in the world” precedent.

According to a story that first broke with a report on July 20 in the South China Morning Post and that was subsequently picked up by various international media, Taiwan’s recent pledge to fund an Israeli settlement health project in the West Bank has broken international norms proscribing engagement with Israel’s occupation. Israel’s settlements and overall presence in the West Bank have been deemed illegal by several international bodies, including the United Nations Security Council (No.2334, 2016), United Nations General Assembly (2024/Sep.) and the International Court of Justice (2024/July). The ICJ has specifically ruled that all states are not to “render aid or assistance” toward “maintaining Israel's presence in the occupied territories.” Despite this consensus in the international bodies, “Taiwan seems to be,” according to Gleider Hernández, professor of public international law at the University of Leuven in Belgium, “the first government to make a direct financial contribution to the settlements.”

Yes, we have not forgotten about No Other Land, awarded Best Documentary Feature Film by the 97th Annual Academy Awards. Screened recently in Taiwan, this documentary deeply informs our sense of outrage over the brutality visited by Israeli West Bank settlers upon dispossessed and brutalized Palestinians.

Nevertheless, Taiwan’s current DPP-run administration, backed by the party’s parliamentary caucus, has continued to conduct business as usual with Israel. The promise of donations to illegal settlements in the West Bank condoned by the Netanyahu government is nothing more than a naked transaction made in exchange for Israel’s political support of Taiwan. This kind of transactional support is, it must be said, of a shamelessly spurious nature. It is not based on the universal values of democracy and human rights, and its cost is to alienate and lose credibility from over 140 countries globally who recognize the Palestinian state, including the pending recognitions from France and Spain, and who condemn Israel’s illegal settlements.

The current DPP administration presides over a huge tax revenue surplus from 2024 reaching NT$500 billion (approximately US$16.8 billion), yet despite Taiwan’s current economic difficulties and the announcement of 20% tariffs on goods exported to the US, this administration refuses to execute the terms of a tax refund recently passed by the national legislature that would refund NT$10,000 (US$330) to citizens and non-citizen residents. Instead, this government is happy to channel much-needed funds to Israel, whose per capita GDP is 1.6 times that of Taiwan and whose international status as a rogue state in the Middle East, committing genocide in Gaza, is utterly notorious. No wonder activists in Taiwan have been quick to point out that the promised donation to illegal settlements in the West Bank is a source of deep shame, an embarrassment on an international scale that lends a new—and highly negative—connotation to the slogan, promoted by the DPP in recent years, “Taiwan Can Help.”

In addition to provoking an unfathomable loss of credibility on an international scale, Taiwan’s reckless actions also reawaken the baggage of deeper historical and structural precedents. For there was a time not so long ago when Taiwan was actively interested in learning from Israel, the American attack dog in the Middle East. In the 1960s and 70s, when the Israeli arms industry was a major supplier of small arms to Guatemala and Israel’s counterinsurgency experts advised security forces in Guatemala and other Central American nations in the genocidal operations conducted by brutal oligarchic dictatorships in the region, Taiwan’s political propagandists enthusiastically followed suit, sending their own delegations to help train Central American governmental death squads. Thus, Taiwan’s name was indissociably linked with that of Israel in assisting Central American dictatorial regimes, doing the bidding of US Empire to control its so-called “backyard.” In the eyes of the Global South, Taiwan lost credibility on an international scale a long time ago. In fact, the list of actions that have contributed to a growing loss of international credibility is long. The recent “Operation Grim Beeper” pager attack conducted by Israeli intelligence forces that resulted in indiscriminate mass civilian casualties relied on pagers suspiciously assembled by a certain manufacturing company in Taiwan.

The root cause of this notorious and illegal political tradition of Taiwan stems from Taiwan’s total dependence on the US after WWII. Boasting a strategic location in the First Island Chain as part of the US containment policy directed against China, Taiwan has willfully taken up a role as the unofficial provocateur for the US in East Asia by sporting an aggressive anticommunist posture. The current DDP government of Taiwan continues this ignominious tradition by advancing a policy of “Protecting Taiwan by Confronting China” (抗中保台) in order to gain American protection and acquire backing for the DPP’s claims to exclusively represent what it considers to be the national sovereignty of Taiwan against the so-called constant threats of China. In light of this sordid history, it is clear that Israel’s relation to Taiwan can be likened to that of a proverbial older brother. As the stronger and more infamous imperial attack dog in the Middle East, Israel has set a bad example for Taiwan, the “little brother” that emulates the older one by treating China as an alien enemy and confronting it in alignment with US strategic goals.

In order to definitively put an end to this notorious political legacy and to disassociate itself from Israel, Taiwan needs, variously, to stop constantly confronting China, to stop constantly being a vassal of the US, to bravely take a principled neutral position between China and the US, to interact in a friendly manner with both China and the US, and, finally, to befriend the Global South. This also means that we need to help the Palestinian people in both Gaza and the West Bank and sincerely donate whatever we can to help them. Although we may not be “first in the world” in this respect, it is never too late to offer a helping hand to the dispossessed.

To that end, we are compelled to express our solemn condemnation on four points of the Faustian diplomacy undertaken by President Lai. On Lai’s watch, Taiwan is trading with the devil, as it were, an inglorious deal symbolized by the unwholesome alignment between the settler colonial societies of Israel and the imperial United States—whether acting in the interest of preserving unipolar global dominance, or in the interest of a MAGA restoration:

1) Taiwan’s donation in this case openly violates international laws and would make Taiwan an accomplice to illegal occupation, colonization, and apartheid.

2) This is a shameful political transaction, trading Taiwan’s national integrity for spurious support.

3) This is yet another short-sighted policy of vassalization, sacrificing Taiwan’s diplomatic autonomy to a great power.

4) This is an open betrayal of Taiwan’s internal needs, ignoring the serious challenges to domestic livelihood.

Finally, we demand:

1) The DPP government should immediately stop all dealings related to illegal settlements in West Bank and apologize to Taiwan’s people for its serious diplomatic mistake.

2) The government of the Republic of China should not engage in any investment, technological cooperation, or official contacts with Israel’s illegal settlements in the West Bank.

(31/July/'25)

Note: The following was the supporting letter from Japan's AALA association.

We fully support your statementstrongly criticizing the Lai administration's policy on the urgent international issue. We share your position that the support for the Netanyahu administration is unacceptable, which continues its barbaric genocide, the starvation strategy in particular.

 

We empathy the reasons why the people of Taiwan have raised their voices in this manner. As the statement points out, the Lai administration in Taiwan appears to be complicit in the strategy of the U.S globalists and neoconservative forces, acting as a proxy to provoke the Mainland China, same as Zelensky in Ukraine against Russia and the Netanyahu in Israel against Middle Eastern countries. Japan is also being utilized in this strategy, and we strongly oppose it.

 

Stopping Israel's genocide and starvation strategy is an urgent task, but the international community's response remains sluggish. While countries like the UK and France have expressed their intention to recognize the Palestinian statehood, they have not taken concrete measures to stop Israel's current actions and continue to provide military support.

 

The Japanese government continues to provide technical cooperation to Israel, holds a significant amount of Israeli government bonds through the national pension fund, and owns a large stake in shares of American military companies that support Isreali crime.

 

Japan AALA demands that these forms of cooperation be immediately halted and that recognition of the Palestinian state be granted.

 

Let us come together to stop the genocide and Middle East invasion carried out by Israel and the United States and work towards peace in East Asia.

Best wishes for all friends

留言

新基進筆記的熱門文章…

Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography

  Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography 1, Brief introduction Daiwie Fu, ( 傅大為 birth in 1953, Sep.) is a   Taiwanese   academic, the founding editor in chief of an international STS academic journal   East Asian Science, Technology and Society , and a self-appointed radical intellectual. Former Distinguished Professor of the graduate institute of STS, now Emeritus Professor in National Yang-Ming Chao-Tong University. His research areas are: science and technology studies, gender and medicine in modern Taiwan, gender and science, East Asian STS, history and philosophy of science, and also history of Chinese science (mainly on   biji , Mengxi Bitan and the cultural history of science in the   Song Dynasty ), and recently he extends his research on actions of contemporary radical intellectuals. He published papers widely in Chinese, English, Italian, Korean, and Japanese. He published three academic books, a few books of social criticisms, an...

懷念凱勒(Evelyn Fox Keller) (2023/Oct.)

 幾個星期前,林力娜寫信給我說,Evelyn 的日子不長了,或許可以寫封信給她。我就馬上寫了,不知她是否曾看到。 後來洪靖告知,Keller 已於九月22號過世,得年87歲。網路上紀念她的訃文很容易找,我就不多引了。 我就在這裡記幾件事,凱勒與我有關的事。 我的第二篇寫性別與科學的研究論文,就是寫「融會在玉米田裡的非男性科學」(1999),雖然有人認為她的名著 A Feeling for the Organism (1983), 已經早不是她的關切所在了,我倒不如此認為。 2008年,全球女性科學家會議在陽明大學舉辦,凱勒來陽明做主題演講,我和洪裕宏榮幸做了評論,印象很深。當時美國正在總統選舉,許多人都希望歐巴馬當選,我們當時與凱勒在盧孳豔家看電視開票,結果歐巴馬當選,當時大家很高興,不知道後來大家對他很失望。那次我們還帶著她去逛士林夜市,劉瑞琪記得,郭文華曾拿豬內臟來挑戰她說是否敢吃?凱勒竟然笑著說,她經歷過二次大戰,什麼艱苦的日子都曾渡過,內臟怎會嚇得到她? 最近幾年有一次,我曾在劍橋大學李約瑟研究所開會,凱勒也在,有一天我在早餐上碰到她,遂與她一起用餐。那時她對我說她正在寫她的回憶錄,說中間會讓很多男性學者很尷尬。因為當年她開始找事時,受到很多男教授的歧視,包括好幾起有名的資深男教授對她的惡意阻礙,真令人驚訝。後來還是一些學校女生希望增加女教授的人數、還有希望有性別方面的課程,讓她才有機會進入學界。也是因為如此,她才開始開授性別與科學方面的課,甚至開出這整個領域來,包括她的 Reflections on Gender and Science (1985) 文集,我在大學教書三十多年,用過她這幾本書幾乎無數次。 最近我也才知道,她的自傳也於今年出版 Making Sense of My Life in Science: A Memoir (2023). 凱勒對我們東亞STS期刊也有一定的注意,也曾批評過拉圖的ANT,以前林力娜曾建議和她要在我們的期刊辦一個關於語言與科學的專題,可惜後來沒有成功。後來我曾在4S會議中我們EASTS的國際編委會上,宣讀過一點我們對她表示感謝與支持的文字,當時凱勒也在場。 ...

燕秋逝世 (2023/Nov.)

幾年以前,當燕秋告知我她得病的消息,並囑我不要說出去,當時我私下感嘆,何以命運待人如此的不公平。 吳燕秋當年是我清華歷史所指導的博士學生。她的題目是當年一般史學界有點禁忌的題目:墮胎的歷史。也是這個非光明正面、非社會運動、非民族的題目,讓她的博士論文,雖然精彩,卻沒有一開始就很奪目。 後來她努力寫了不少其他題目,也曾轉換一些主題,下面秀雲所引的著作目錄,可以參考。但那個目錄並沒有提到她後來努力的一個研究與訪談對象:關於民間釀酒的知識與歷史,下面貞吟提到,她曾寫完論文投稿, 結果台灣史方面的評審說,這個題目有什麼可寫的?我想,這就有點像她早期寫墮胎的題目,邊緣的歷史。 但這也是燕秋一貫努力追求的一點光亮與智慧。 她作新知委員時,在辦理募款餐會時,曾努力把不少師長輩的朋友都拉去參加,害的我們所內的新知委員抱怨說幾乎沒有人可拉了。 我曾與她一起到台南成大參加國際研討會,開會前我們曾利用機會在成大會館前的小酒館大喝了幾杯啤酒。這類似她後來臉書上常貼的酒館照片,那似乎是一種奇特的記錄。 當年我在作EASTS工作時,強調與日韓聯盟,燕秋也曾代表台灣的STS博士生,在韓國與她們學生拼酒。 我們也曾邀請燕秋和伊瑪貓來淡水、還有去北海岸的餐館好好吃幾頓,順便鼓勵她。 在這個過程中,我也曾常勸她好好把文章再修改投稿,直到有一天,她憂傷的對我說,老師我生病了,不想再投稿了。 就如之前秀雲提問說「這樣勤於耕耘,卻難以在台灣找到教職,值得反思。」 並問說「性別醫療史研究難以在性別研究或是史學領域發展嗎?」 但其實,燕秋找工作,不止是找性別研究或史學,還包括STS、通識、中醫藥、醫人文、STM、台灣研究、歷史與文物等等領域或機構,在我替她寫介紹信的長長一列檔案裡,我看到這個時代邊緣研究者的努力與辛酸,還有寫介紹信的人的無奈與挫折。 其實應該還有更多的老師們也替燕秋寫過不少的介紹信。的確,這值得我們有位子的人大家反思。 多年來,燕秋以兼課老師來謀求點微薄的薪資,她的日子可以過下去,當然很大一部分是歸功於伊瑪貓與她相互珍惜,前後一貫的支持。今年三月反戰後,我變得很少上個人臉書,不知道燕秋與伊瑪貓已經結婚, 她們自然有她們的道理,今天也無法再...