跳到主要內容

STS 重鎮 Steven Shapin 2024 年底的新書 Eating and Being (2025/Jan.)

 大家好,新書資訊與參考。

STS/SSK 的重鎮 Steven Shapin (臺灣STS朋友比較熟悉的,大概是他與夏佛1985合著的經典《利維坦與空氣泵浦》,還有他1994的《真理的社會史》二書)2024 年底的新書出版:Eating and Being: A History of Ideas about Our Food and Ourselves

Steven Shapin, Eating and Being: A History of Ideas about Our Food and Ourselves - University of Chicago Press, November 2024 (裡面有其有趣的 table of contents)

New Books discussion with Kelly Spivey Kelly Spivey 和Shapin討論關於此書的訪談共40分鐘。請見這裡的網址。

近二三十年,Shapin 就常在研究這方面的問題,參考他2010的文集 Never Pure, 就可以看到這個軌跡。他所討論的19世紀以前的"Dietetics",在當代已經失去了過去歐洲那長久的意義,現在的中文翻譯(「營養學」)自然也無法再呈現其意義。

What we eat, who we are, and the relationship between the two.
    Eating and Being is a history of Western thinking about food, eating, knowledge, and ourselves. In modern thought, eating is about what is good for you, not about what is good. Eating is about health, not about virtue. Yet this has not always been the case. For a great span of the past—from antiquity through about the middle of the eighteenth century—one of the most pervasive branches of medicine was known as dietetics, prescribing not only what people should eat but also how they should order many aspects of their lives, including sleep, exercise, and emotional management. Dietetics did not distinguish between the medical and the moral, nor did it acknowledge the difference between what was good for you and what was good. Dietetics counseled moderation in all things, where moderation was counted as a virtue as well as the way to health. But during the nineteenth century, nutrition science began to replace the language of traditional dietetics with the vocabulary of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and calories, and the medical and the moral went their separate ways. Steven Shapin shows how much depended upon that shift, and he also explores the extent to which the sensibilities of dietetics have been lost.
    Throughout this rich history, he evokes what it felt like to eat during another historical period and invites us to reflect on what it means to feel about food as we now do. Shapin shows how the change from dietetics to nutrition science fundamentally altered how we think about our food and its powers, our bodies, and our minds.

留言

新基進筆記的熱門文章…

Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography

  Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography 1, Brief introduction Daiwie Fu, ( 傅大為 birth in 1953, Sep.) is a   Taiwanese   academic, the founding editor in chief of an international STS academic journal   East Asian Science, Technology and Society , and a self-appointed radical intellectual. Former Distinguished Professor of the graduate institute of STS, now Emeritus Professor in National Yang-Ming Chao-Tong University. His research areas are: science and technology studies, gender and medicine in modern Taiwan, gender and science, East Asian STS, history and philosophy of science, and also history of Chinese science (mainly on   biji , Mengxi Bitan and the cultural history of science in the   Song Dynasty ), and recently he extends his research on actions of contemporary radical intellectuals. He published papers widely in Chinese, English, Italian, Korean, and Japanese. He published three academic books, a few books of social criticisms, an...

懷念凱勒(Evelyn Fox Keller) (2023/Oct.)

 幾個星期前,林力娜寫信給我說,Evelyn 的日子不長了,或許可以寫封信給她。我就馬上寫了,不知她是否曾看到。 後來洪靖告知,Keller 已於九月22號過世,得年87歲。網路上紀念她的訃文很容易找,我就不多引了。 我就在這裡記幾件事,凱勒與我有關的事。 我的第二篇寫性別與科學的研究論文,就是寫「融會在玉米田裡的非男性科學」(1999),雖然有人認為她的名著 A Feeling for the Organism (1983), 已經早不是她的關切所在了,我倒不如此認為。 2008年,全球女性科學家會議在陽明大學舉辦,凱勒來陽明做主題演講,我和洪裕宏榮幸做了評論,印象很深。當時美國正在總統選舉,許多人都希望歐巴馬當選,我們當時與凱勒在盧孳豔家看電視開票,結果歐巴馬當選,當時大家很高興,不知道後來大家對他很失望。那次我們還帶著她去逛士林夜市,劉瑞琪記得,郭文華曾拿豬內臟來挑戰她說是否敢吃?凱勒竟然笑著說,她經歷過二次大戰,什麼艱苦的日子都曾渡過,內臟怎會嚇得到她? 最近幾年有一次,我曾在劍橋大學李約瑟研究所開會,凱勒也在,有一天我在早餐上碰到她,遂與她一起用餐。那時她對我說她正在寫她的回憶錄,說中間會讓很多男性學者很尷尬。因為當年她開始找事時,受到很多男教授的歧視,包括好幾起有名的資深男教授對她的惡意阻礙,真令人驚訝。後來還是一些學校女生希望增加女教授的人數、還有希望有性別方面的課程,讓她才有機會進入學界。也是因為如此,她才開始開授性別與科學方面的課,甚至開出這整個領域來,包括她的 Reflections on Gender and Science (1985) 文集,我在大學教書三十多年,用過她這幾本書幾乎無數次。 最近我也才知道,她的自傳也於今年出版 Making Sense of My Life in Science: A Memoir (2023). 凱勒對我們東亞STS期刊也有一定的注意,也曾批評過拉圖的ANT,以前林力娜曾建議和她要在我們的期刊辦一個關於語言與科學的專題,可惜後來沒有成功。後來我曾在4S會議中我們EASTS的國際編委會上,宣讀過一點我們對她表示感謝與支持的文字,當時凱勒也在場。 ...

杭士基談俄國入侵烏克蘭

  杭士基談俄國入侵烏克蘭: 它的起源、如何應對、與人類歷史的關鍵 杭士基在 2022 三月一日發表了這個談話。雖然離今天已經過了一個星期了,但這個談話的觀察與回顧,超越了每日的侵略與戰爭進展,很值得我們細讀與反思,甚至可以放進台灣今天的脈絡裡。文中有七個地方,杭士基訪談原文在那裡都有進一步的網址,算是他自己的資料註釋。有興趣的讀者可以進入網頁原文去找那些超連結,另外我也加了八個譯注, 放在譯文結尾 。 傅大為 Mar. 8th 此文在 Truthout 的原網址為: https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/ ------------------------------     諾姆.杭士基 (Noam Chomsky) :美國對俄國的軍事行動升級,不會有勝利者 Truthout, 1/March/2022, C.J.Polychroniou 訪談 傅大為譯 2022/3/8 前言: 俄國入侵烏克蘭,讓世人大吃一驚。杭士基在一個 Truthout 的獨家訪談中認為,它是個無端、沒有正當理由的攻擊,並將成為 21 世紀歷史上最主要的戰火罪行之一。俄國總統普丁的政治考慮,不能用來做為發動入侵一個主權國家的理由。但是,面對這個可怕的入侵,美國一定得採用緊急的外交作法,而非軍事行動的升級,因為後者可能會成為「執行我們整個物種的死刑,沒有任何勝利的一方」。 諾姆.杭士基 (Noam Chomsky) 是國際上承認當今在世最重要的知識分子之一。他的知識地位曾被拿來與伽利略、牛頓與笛卡爾做比較,因為他的工作在一整串不同的學術與科學研究上都有極大的影響,包括了語言學、邏輯與數學、計算機科學、心理學、媒體研究、哲學、政治與國際關係等。他是約 150 本書的作者。。。 MIT 的榮譽學院教授、目前是 Arizona 大學的桂冠教授。   Polychroniou: 諾姆,俄國入侵烏克蘭,驚訝了很多人,震驚了世界。但早有很多的跡象顯示,普丁對 NATO (北大西洋公約組織)的向東擴張、還有華盛頓拒絕認真看待普丁的維安「紅線」(包括烏克蘭...