跳到主要內容

STS 重鎮 Steven Shapin 2024 年底的新書 Eating and Being (2025/Jan.)

 大家好,新書資訊與參考。

STS/SSK 的重鎮 Steven Shapin (臺灣STS朋友比較熟悉的,大概是他與夏佛1985合著的經典《利維坦與空氣泵浦》,還有他1994的《真理的社會史》二書)2024 年底的新書出版:Eating and Being: A History of Ideas about Our Food and Ourselves

Steven Shapin, Eating and Being: A History of Ideas about Our Food and Ourselves - University of Chicago Press, November 2024 (裡面有其有趣的 table of contents)

New Books discussion with Kelly Spivey Kelly Spivey 和Shapin討論關於此書的訪談共40分鐘。請見這裡的網址。

近二三十年,Shapin 就常在研究這方面的問題,參考他2010的文集 Never Pure, 就可以看到這個軌跡。他所討論的19世紀以前的"Dietetics",在當代已經失去了過去歐洲那長久的意義,現在的中文翻譯(「營養學」)自然也無法再呈現其意義。

What we eat, who we are, and the relationship between the two.
    Eating and Being is a history of Western thinking about food, eating, knowledge, and ourselves. In modern thought, eating is about what is good for you, not about what is good. Eating is about health, not about virtue. Yet this has not always been the case. For a great span of the past—from antiquity through about the middle of the eighteenth century—one of the most pervasive branches of medicine was known as dietetics, prescribing not only what people should eat but also how they should order many aspects of their lives, including sleep, exercise, and emotional management. Dietetics did not distinguish between the medical and the moral, nor did it acknowledge the difference between what was good for you and what was good. Dietetics counseled moderation in all things, where moderation was counted as a virtue as well as the way to health. But during the nineteenth century, nutrition science began to replace the language of traditional dietetics with the vocabulary of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and calories, and the medical and the moral went their separate ways. Steven Shapin shows how much depended upon that shift, and he also explores the extent to which the sensibilities of dietetics have been lost.
    Throughout this rich history, he evokes what it felt like to eat during another historical period and invites us to reflect on what it means to feel about food as we now do. Shapin shows how the change from dietetics to nutrition science fundamentally altered how we think about our food and its powers, our bodies, and our minds.

留言

新基進筆記的熱門文章…

Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography

  Daiwie Fu: A Brief Intellectual Biography 1, Brief introduction Daiwie Fu, ( 傅大為 birth in 1953, Sep.) is a   Taiwanese   academic, the founding editor in chief of an international STS academic journal   East Asian Science, Technology and Society , and a self-appointed radical intellectual. Former Distinguished Professor of the graduate institute of STS, now Emeritus Professor in National Yang-Ming Chao-Tong University. His research areas are: science and technology studies, gender and medicine in modern Taiwan, gender and science, East Asian STS, history and philosophy of science, and also history of Chinese science (mainly on   biji , Mengxi Bitan and the cultural history of science in the   Song Dynasty ), and recently he extends his research on actions of contemporary radical intellectuals. He published papers widely in Chinese, English, Italian, Korean, and Japanese. He published three academic books, a few books of social criticisms, an...

杭士基談俄國入侵烏克蘭

  杭士基談俄國入侵烏克蘭: 它的起源、如何應對、與人類歷史的關鍵 杭士基在 2022 三月一日發表了這個談話。雖然離今天已經過了一個星期了,但這個談話的觀察與回顧,超越了每日的侵略與戰爭進展,很值得我們細讀與反思,甚至可以放進台灣今天的脈絡裡。文中有七個地方,杭士基訪談原文在那裡都有進一步的網址,算是他自己的資料註釋。有興趣的讀者可以進入網頁原文去找那些超連結,另外我也加了八個譯注, 放在譯文結尾 。 傅大為 Mar. 8th 此文在 Truthout 的原網址為: https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/ ------------------------------     諾姆.杭士基 (Noam Chomsky) :美國對俄國的軍事行動升級,不會有勝利者 Truthout, 1/March/2022, C.J.Polychroniou 訪談 傅大為譯 2022/3/8 前言: 俄國入侵烏克蘭,讓世人大吃一驚。杭士基在一個 Truthout 的獨家訪談中認為,它是個無端、沒有正當理由的攻擊,並將成為 21 世紀歷史上最主要的戰火罪行之一。俄國總統普丁的政治考慮,不能用來做為發動入侵一個主權國家的理由。但是,面對這個可怕的入侵,美國一定得採用緊急的外交作法,而非軍事行動的升級,因為後者可能會成為「執行我們整個物種的死刑,沒有任何勝利的一方」。 諾姆.杭士基 (Noam Chomsky) 是國際上承認當今在世最重要的知識分子之一。他的知識地位曾被拿來與伽利略、牛頓與笛卡爾做比較,因為他的工作在一整串不同的學術與科學研究上都有極大的影響,包括了語言學、邏輯與數學、計算機科學、心理學、媒體研究、哲學、政治與國際關係等。他是約 150 本書的作者。。。 MIT 的榮譽學院教授、目前是 Arizona 大學的桂冠教授。   Polychroniou: 諾姆,俄國入侵烏克蘭,驚訝了很多人,震驚了世界。但早有很多的跡象顯示,普丁對 NATO (北大西洋公約組織)的向東擴張、還有華盛頓拒絕認真看待普丁的維安「紅線」(包括烏克蘭...

聊聊牛尾巴上的Netflix (2022/Jan.)

  聊聊牛尾巴上的Netflix. 各位朋友,牛年終於結尾,希望來年大虎一來,怒吼幾聲,可以把纏繞我們近乎一整年的疫情與病毒嚇走啊。這一年來,我們都常待在家中,除了視訊與電腦工作外,大約看電視、看Netflix的電影與連續劇,佔了我們不少休閒的時間。現在屆此年尾,回顧一下近來的一些影劇,每部簡單談談幾句,希望朋友有興致的話,也來看看聊聊如何。大為 后翼棄兵(The Queen’s Gambit)。這是大家多稱讚的連續劇,講一位西洋棋女棋手如何奮鬥成名的故事。過去類似的電影常以小男孩為主角,跟著一位大師,這次講一位少女,經歷自然不同,常與年輕男性切磋棋藝。后翼棄兵,是西洋棋中著名的一個佈局策略。女棋手出場,常以鮮麗的衣著奪人,這是Netflix拍年輕女主角的手法,艾蜜莉在巴黎也一樣。 斯卡羅。我之前在FB上談過。本來十分期待,後來大約劇本結構不佳,拍攝也有問題,而且預設許多歷史知識或真假爭議,一般觀眾不見得理解。似乎有點浪費掉了一個好故事。公視另外一個長劇,一把青,也不怎麼樣,看了幾集就放棄。 茶金。朋友推薦,在公視裡大概算不錯的一個長劇,裡面對製茶家族與茶業的技術系統,有許多細節的討論,從STS角度來看,也頗有點意思。只是後來的政治干預等,簡化而沒信服力。但北埔茶虎一家的歷史,在茶金一劇中改編的更有意思一些。我以前在新竹,喝過東方美人茶,並沒有驚艷,不知道與過去那種茶的關係為何。 魷魚遊戲。其實我不太清楚,為何歐美人那麼對此片有興趣?除了他們小時候大概沒玩過一二三木頭人?而且到最後的魷魚遊戲本身,實在不好玩。看到後來,除了許多頗為荒謬的劇情外,倒是想到一個去玩味此劇的方式,那就是魷魚遊戲其實是過去17世紀英國政治哲學家霍布士(Hobbes)的想像,複製到當代東亞的「自然情境」(state of nature),是一場所有人與所有人的戰爭(a war of all against all)。或許這正式歐美人潛意識喜歡或回憶起他們過去恐怖時代的原因吧?哈哈。 千萬別抬頭。這是慧星撞地球一類電影的最新後現代展示。如果Melancholia(驚悚末日)是個精緻唯美的超現實末日,慧星撞地球(deep impact)則是個眾人開始面對自己的當代告解,那麼世界末日(Armageddon)則是好萊塢夢幻下的美國英雄再次拯救世界,而千萬別抬頭(Don’t look up)則是...